点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
终端需求提升叠加优惠促销活动 节前白酒市场销售明显回暖******
记者 王 鹤
见习记者 冯雨瑶
2023年农历新年的脚步越来越近，作为春节送礼的“硬通货”，近期白酒终端销售回暖明显。1月11日，《证券日报》记者走访北京地区多家烟酒店及商超了解到，不少白酒品牌已推出优惠促销活动。
1月11日，《证券日报》记者来到北京市海淀区某商场地下商超的酒水专区发现，不少白酒品牌已推出优惠、促销活动。
“今年大家返乡过节意愿强烈，到店购酒的人明显增多，我们要紧抓这个时间节点推动白酒销售。”该酒水专区相关工作人员对《证券日报》记者表示，“货架上的多数白酒品牌都有折扣，节前购买很划算。”
广东悦品汇商贸有限公司总经理钱永胜告诉《证券日报》记者：“进入1月份，人们的购酒需求明显增加，渠道端库存已较之前消化掉一些。”
随着终端销售回暖，多家券商判断白酒行业预期向好。
国泰君安发布研报称，对白酒消费修复更加乐观，叠加宏观政策红利有望助力消费振兴，白酒“开门红”平稳推进。
国金证券研报表示，从动销看，负面因素在消除，春节返乡情况好于预期。从场景看，春节走亲访友的送礼需求恢复确定性最强，宴席、企业年会部分推迟至年后，实际春节受益时间拉长。从业绩端看，春节地产酒回款目标、进度基本与往年相当。
二级市场上，此前经历深度调整的白酒板块也迎来一轮估值修复。业内认为，春节假期白酒市场预期向好，有望继续推动行业上行，预计高端品牌以及终端动销较好的地产酒品牌最为受益。
在白酒业向好预期下，春节前不少白酒企业打响“营销战”。贵州茅台于近期推出了“元宇宙+酒”的营销模式，在兔年茅台生肖酒上线之际，同步在其数字平台上线同款数字藏品。新年伊始，五粮液在全国48个城市举办以“和美五粮液幸福中国年”为主题的团圆宴，并通过核心大单品——第八代五粮液焕新包装的重磅动作，抢滩元旦春节旺季营销。
不过，业内普遍认为白酒行业修复尚需时日。“今年春节期间白酒消费会有明显提升，但受到经销商库存压力较高影响，市场或仍以消化库存为主。”酒业人士、武汉京魁科技有限公司董事长肖竹青对《证券日报》记者表示。
2022年以来，受多重因素影响，白酒渠道端库存压力加大。据部分地区经销商反馈，当前虽然白酒行业迎来旺季，但仍无补货需求，还处于观望状态。
对此，肖竹青表示：“在经济回暖、市场预期好转的背景下，预计今年中秋节后白酒业会回归正常。”开源证券也预计，至2023年中秋可将渠道库存去化到自然状态。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
彩神app地图 |
)